When I was in college I worked out at a little hole-in-the-wall gym on Philadelphia Street in Indiana, PA. The fitness center at school was always crowded or being used by a class, so I’d scrape together a few extra bucks to work out in this place that looked very much like the gym Rocky Balboa worked out in—you know, heavy bag in the corner, metal plate weights, dim lighting, the smell of decades of sweat, that kind of thing.
I was always the smallest guy in the gym. There were guys there who could lift a small town, wearing their weight belts and grunting furiously when they’d rack a bending barbell over their heads. The music was loud and classic rock (not the poppy stuff they played on campus—no Madonna, no Depeche Mode) and guys were not afraid to grimace, grunt, and groan.
Those kinds of gyms have largely been replaced these days by sleek, ultramodern fitness centers. I work out at the Fieldhouse and really like it there, and I’m sure many of you work out in similar places. While the equipment is better and the place much cleaner, with flat panel TVs and such and showers that aren’t growing new species, there’s something kind of antiseptic about it. You can sweat and do all the working out you like, but you’re pretty much expected to be quiet about it. I have to supply my own classic rock and it’s got to be injected directly into my ear via my MP3 player.
I read an article recently about a guy named Albert Argibay who worked out at a Planet Fitness gym in New York. Albert is a New York State corrections officer—he works in a prison and working out for him is really about survival, so he takes it pretty seriously. One day Albert was doing a clean and jerk of about 500 pounds over his head—try to fathom that—and in the process Albert was grunting like, well, like a guy lifting 500 pounds over his head. When I hear somebody doing that, I turn and look and am often impressed. After all, I grunt when I’m on the 8th rep of a hundred pounds—not exactly world class strength.
Turns out, though, that Albert’s grunting was a big no-no. See, Planet Fitness has banned grunting during weightlifting at their 120 locations. In an attempt to eliminate any gym practices that might intimidate workout novices, their locations each come equipped with a Lunk Alarm. The Lunk Alarm is a giant purple siren mounted on the wall next to this definition: “lunk – n. [slang] one who grunts, drops weights, or judges.” When a manager approached Albert about his grunting, a tense conversation ensued which led to Albert being escorted out by police and his membership revoked. That’s right, Albert got tossed out of the gym for making noise while he exercised. In the gym I worked out at in Indiana, PA, that kind of grunting would’ve gotten high fives from everyone.
Two questions leap to mind here: 1) Would you confront a guy who just lifted 500 pounds over his head? and, 2) Doesn’t a serious workout require some expression of pain?
Sure, grunting may be mildly rude if uttered loud enough to carry across the gym floor, but it’s merely an exaggeration of a healthy function during weightlifting. Exhaling during the exertion portion of a lift is important for lowering the high pressures in the chest cavity which can lead to broken blood vessels or even a hernia. Physical therapy research even shows that grunting can create 2 to 5 percent greater force during lifting as it helps stabilize one’s spine.
Did you watch any of the U.S. Open Tennis this week? How many of these professional tennis players, playing in expensive outfits before quiet crowds, keep quiet when they hit the ball. I mean, come on, if you just put the TV on and weren’t watching you’d swear you were hearing someone being tortured. Maria Sharapova, Andy Roddick—all grunting and yelping. Yet, somehow they don’t get tossed off the court.
OK, I’ll admit that Planet Fitness is probably right in trying to promote a non-judgmental environment, but have they gone too far? Is banning grunting turning the workout world into a coddle culture? If you’re going to get the gain of a workout, you’ve got to be able to do the work full out. It’s a work out, not a work-in. It’s a gym, not a library.
You might have read my little piece for the newsletter this month talking about people who join a gym but almost never go. Their commitment stops at the point of pain. If it hurts, even a little bit, they don’t want to do it anymore. That’s why the gym is packed the first two weeks of January and then back to normal by Groundhog Day. Pain tends to weed out the uncommitted.
When I read this passage in Luke’s Gospel I hear Jesus sounding like a serious personal trainer reminding the crowds of the pain that weeds out the uncommitted. The crowds have been following Jesus, seeing him as being very popular. They like to listen to him, and they like the idea of following him. Jesus is at the height of his popularity, but rather than bask in the glow, he whips around and tells the crowd point blank that following him will be spiritually and physically demanding. There’s no five happy hops to heaven here, no promise of spiritual fitness if one is just nice to one’s neighbors. Jesus clearly defines discipleship in terms of the cost in blood, sweat, and tears.
The conditions for discipleship that Jesus sets are muscular indeed. Take a look at these in order. First, Jesus says that unless a would-be follower “hates” their family and even “life itself” he or she cannot be Jesus’ disciple. Jesus is using some exaggeration here for effect, which was one of the characteristics of rabbinic discourse, but the point is still pretty clear. This doesn’t mean you get to write-off your irritating in-laws (if you are unfortunate enough to have them—I like mine). “Hate” here is a word that denotes contrast. For Jesus, a disciple’s priority must be so evidently on Christ and kingdom that by comparison it’s as if they hate their family.
For the twelve who followed Jesus, this was the real deal. They literally left their families behind to follow Jesus around. Many never returned. It seems unthinkable in a culture like ours and, in many ways, it was unthinkable then, too. Subjugating one’s family to following Jesus is, indeed, a groan-inducing call. But there it is. Now, you may not be called to leave your family behind to be a disciple, but we are all called to evaluate how our love for family compares to our love of Jesus. What about the amount of quality time we spend with family as compared to God? Is worship on Sunday morning, for example, more important than a kids’ soccer game. When Church, a child’s spiritual formation, setting aside time for God, becomes less of a priority than a game, we’re elevating the comfort of family over following Christ. A soccer team is great, but it doesn’t compare to the grace and love of God. What are we teaching our kids about the value of faith when it is always put on the back burner for something else?
Or, how about this? Think about how much money you spent on family vacations and outings this summer. Got a rough figure? Now think about how much you gave to causes that serve those in need—the church, charities, other avenues that make an impact for God’s Kingdom. How do those two figures compare? How much have you spent this year on things to make your family more comfortable, versus how much you gave to make the lives of those who are poor and marginalized more comfortable? Those comparisons will tell you a lot about your priorities versus that of Jesus. It’s not that we shouldn’t take our families on vacation, it’s just that disciples of Jesus are called to re-order our priorities.
But Jesus doesn’t stop there. The grunts and groans just keep on coming. The short parables about building a tower and going to war are all about what it costs to be a disciple. It’s easy to start, says Jesus, but are we willing to finish the work?
Truth is that it costs a lot to be a follower of Jesus, that is, if you’re doing it right. Add up the amount of money we spend on tithing, supporting missionaries and Christian charities, the church building fund, buying books and paying for kids’ camps, etc. Now think about the fact that a nonbeliever doesn’t spend any of that money the way we do. It costs a bit, doesn’t it?
But the question Jesus is raising is whether or not it costs us enough. The idea of starting to build a tower and not having the funds to finish it points out the crowd/fan club’s shallow view of how much financial sacrifice goes into vibrant faith. To love Jesus means loving money, possessions and comfort so little that we give uncomfortable amounts of it away. That’s what Jesus means about giving up possessions in order to follow.
The classic thought from C.S. Lewis drives home this idea of the financial cost of discipleship: “I am afraid the only safe rule is to give more than we can spare. In other words, if our expenditures on comforts, luxuries, amusements, etc., is up to the standard common among those with the same income as our own, we are probably giving away too little. If our charities do not at all pinch or hamper us, I should say they are too small. There ought to be things we should like to do and cannot do because our charity expenditure excludes them.”
Family and money are two areas of huge personal value, and Jesus wants to know how he stacks up next to them. Interestingly, these are two of the highest cultural values in America. Jesus calls those values into question. You can’t be a real disciple, he says, a real follower, unless your willing to do the grunt work of giving up the things that are most important to us.
But as if that weren’t enough, Jesus goes further. He pushes the crowd with an even more personal demand. To follow me, he says, you’ve got to be willing to let go of family and finances—but even more you have to give up yourself.
The most powerful image to convey this in today’s passage is verse 27: “Whoever does not carry the cross and follow me cannot be my disciple.” Not may not, cannot.
And remember that Jesus had not yet gone to his own cross, so he is not referencing any spiritualized understanding of what a cross meant. For Jesus, “bearing one’s cross” wasn’t about struggling with some physical ailment or problem. He is in fact referring to the Roman torture device, the universally recognized instrument of execution. The cross is that thing which costs people their very lives. Jesus is warning the crowd that no one can follow him unless they are prepared to suffer the same fate that Jesus would suffer—death at the hands of a sinful humanity.
Now the truth is that you and I may not be called to martyrdom, but we are called to die. Paul uses this language throughout his letters. To “die” with Christ means to put to death our old, sinful, self-indulgent lives and embrace instead the Jesus way of living. “I have been crucified with Christ,” says Paul in Galatians, “and it is no longer I who live, but Christ who lives in me.” To pick up cross means to put to death everything that holds us back for living the life we were intended—lives that reflect the glory of Christ in us.
But like the real cross of Jesus, putting something to death is a painful process. C.S. Lewis is again helpful here. I’ve been reading and re-reading Lewis’s allegory about heaven titled “The Great Divorce” and there’s a part in the story that grips me every time I read it. A ghost, a spirit of a man, comes to the shores of heaven but he has a little red lizard on his shoulder that whispers things into the ghost’s ear. The man knows that the lizard is telling him lies, but he listens anyway (the lizard represents lust). An Angel, a figure representing Jesus, meets the ghost and offers to kill the lizard for him. The ghost hims, haws, and hesitates. He wants the lizard dead, but he’s afraid to let it go because it will hurt to give up the guilty pleasure. He’s afraid that killing the lizard will mean his own death.
The Angel, however, persists. He reminds the ghost that he can kill the lizard, but the Ghost will have to give permission.
Eventually, the Ghost gives up in desperation. “You’re right,” he says to the Angel, “I would be better to be dead than to live with this creature.”
The Angel kills the lizard, which transforms into a beautiful stallion. The Ghost jumps on its back and rides into heaven. The moral? Putting sin to death in us is a difficult process, a process that may even make us cry out in protest and pain. But it’s the only way we can really follow the way of Jesus. Every one of us has some kind of lizard whispering in our ear—a lizard representing lust, money, work, status, power—and that lizard has to die if we’re going to experience real life in Christ.
There’s no “gentle Jesus, meek and mild” here. This is a Jesus calling people to hard work, grunt work. Is Jesus graceful? Yes. Is he loving? Yes. But does he overlook what we do? Not at all. Our entire life must be given to him.
This is hard stuff, to be sure. It’s so hard that many Christians believe that discipleship is something that’s reserved for just a few faithful fanatics. For most people, being a Christian is about going to church, being nice to people, subscribing to a particular set of beliefs, being a respectable and moral person. All those are good things, but they are not what Jesus called people to be. Interestingly, the word “disciple” appears 269 times in the New Testament, while “Christian” is found only three times, mostly to differentiate this group of people as distinct from the Jews. Says Dallas Willard, “The New Testament is a book about disciples, by disciples, and for disciples of Jesus Christ.” To be a Christian is to be a disciple.
The crowd must have balked at what Jesus was saying. I imagine many turned away at that point. We know that many would later. It seemed that the more Jesus talked about this, the fewer people he retained. So much for church growth.
What’s important here, though, is that the life that Jesus was calling people to wasn’t simply a religion—it was a whole lifestyle. Dallas Willard, whose book The Great Omission has been gripping my soul this week, says that Jesus never commanded his disciples to “go and make Christians”—members of a religion. Instead, it was “go and make disciples”—people who will reflect the character of Jesus and change the world.
This has been a painful week for me wrestling with this text. It convicts me, both as a person and as a spiritual leader. Have we been “making disciples” as a church or have we simply been playing the part of Christians? Is the world around us different because we have followed the radical call of Jesus, or do we simply accommodate our spiritual lives to the culture around us, earning more, spending more, using our prime time for ourselves, coming to church occasionally and calling it Christianity? These are questions I think we need to wrestle with individually and as a church.
Some questions for reflection:
On a 1 to 10 scale, how would you rate your own discipleship after Jesus right now?
• What things keep this number from being higher?
• What habits, actions or attitudes would help that area of your life?
• What changes can you make to start living out those habits, actions and attitudes?
• Whom do you need to share these things with so they can help you and pray for you?
This is a conversation I’d love for us to have together as we seek to be Christ’s church.
Dietrich Bonhoeffer, the German pastor who was martyred by the Nazis during World War II, offers soul-rattling words that fit well with Jesus’ teaching: “The call separates a small group, those who follow, from the great mass of the people. The disciples are few and will always be only a few.”
How can each of us be more of the small group, the few, the disciples? Go ahead and grunt if you need to. A little hard work and sweat comes with kingdom exertion.
Source: “Grunting Allowed,” Homiletics, September-October 2007, p. 21-23.
Recent Comments