The God Who Comes
Isaiah 64:1-9
A few weeks back I saw an article from Great Britain about a new campaign that’s being advertised on the sides of those double decker buses you see tooling around London. While people in Great Britain are used to seeing church and religious signs and symbols on buses and in other public places, this campaign goes the other direction. The signs say, “There probably is no God. Now stop worrying and enjoy your life.”
The campaign is sponsored by the British Humanist Association, an atheist group. Richard Dawkins, the atheist professor who wrote the bestseller The God Delusion, is helping to fund the project. Says Dawkins, “Religion is accustomed to getting a free ride - automatic tax breaks, unearned respect and the right not to be offended, the right to brainwash children. Even on the buses, nobody thinks twice when they see a religious slogan plastered across the side. This campaign to put alternative slogans on London buses will make people think - and thinking is anathema to religion."
Dawkins, along with Christopher Hitchens and several others, have formed a kind of loose association of what we might call neo-atheists: intelligentsia who are determined to convince everyone that religion is the cause of much if not most of the pain and suffering in the world and that we’d all be better off without it. Take away peoples’ irrational belief in God, they seem to be saying, then you’ll solve many of the world’s problems.
Now, I’ve seen a rash of books out lately that are designed to deflate the arguments of Dawkins and Hitchens, written by Christian authors mostly who want to argue ontologically for the existence of God. It’s actually not a new debate, though, it’s just gaining more press.
You’d think that Christian churches and other religious institutions would be offended by this kind of stuff. Recently in our own country, comedian Bill Maher brought us the film “Religulous” that is a caustic attack on religion and religious people as fools or charlatans. You can almost hear the cries of protest from religious people.
But I found it interesting that our brothers and sisters in the British Methodist Church, who have to look at these busses every day, took a different tack on the whole issue. Rev Jenny Ellis, Spirituality and Discipleship Officer for the British Methodist Church, said, “We are grateful to Richard for his continued interest in God and for encouraging people to think about these issues. This campaign will be a good thing if it gets people to engage with the deepest questions of life. As Christians, we respond to Jesus’ call to love God with our minds as well as our hearts, souls and strength. Christianity is for people who aren’t afraid to think about life and meaning. John Wesley, the founder of Methodism, believed that no one should be saved from the trouble of thinking because that is the path to understanding God.”
In other words, “Bring it on.”
The bottom line issue here is, I think, the desire for people to have proof of God. To know about God empirically, ontologically, in a corporate way. The question comes to me as a pastor in several ways, most prominently when people ask, “Why doesn’t God break open the heavens and reveal himself, removing all doubt?” Many people in the world do, in fact, go on about their lives without any thought of God.
Many religious people will want to turn to the Bible for proof of God’s existence, but it’s a biased document that makes it hard to use as primary source material. See, the Bible isn’t focused on proving God’s existence or on encouraging people to think about God. Instead, the Bible is always focused on the experience of God. It’s the story of a particular peoples’ journey and wrestling and experiential engagement with God. The biblical writers were not philosophers—they were pilgrims on a journey with God. It’s easy to deny God’s existence when all you’ve done is thought about God. It’s harder to do so when you have a personal experience.
The Bible characterizes that experience, however, in terms of both worship and doubt. Sometimes it seems like there probably is no God, even to those who follow him. That’s the emotion and thought that the prophet Isaiah is portraying in this passage.
“Oh that you would tear open the heavens and come down,” cries the prophet. Wouldn’t it be best is God made an awesome display of power and might evident to all the “nations” (Isaiah 64:1-2). The writer saw God as living in the “holy and glorious habitation” of heaven, but lamented that God seemed to be so distant, withholding God’s “heart” and “compassion” from the writer and his people (63:15). God had previously been present with his people in power, delivering them out of Egypt, leading them by a pillar of cloud and a pillar of fire, revealing God’s glory in giving the Law to Moses on Mount Sinai, dwelling with Israel in the wilderness tabernacle, inhabiting the Temple built by Solomon, going before Israel in battle and doing more “awesome deeds” that God’s people had not expected. They were relying on experience, not thought. No one in history had ever heard of or seen a God so powerfully present and active on behalf of his people (64:3-4). Now, though, as the people suffered from the sting of defeat and exile at the hand of the Babylonians it was clear to them that God had closed up the clouds and turned off the fireworks on their behalf.
People seem to always want signs from God, but tend to ignore them when they’re present. Even while God was making the “mountains quake” at Sinai in Exodus 32, talking with Moses in the cloud and giving him the Law, the people of Israel were at the bottom of the mountain that very moment complaining against God and Moses and crafting their own god in the form of a golden calf. No matter how spectacular the sign or evidence, humans are easily blinded to God’s presence and power because of sin—the serious human drive for self-interest and self-indulgence. Sin has a way of blocking our view of God by putting up a mirror that causes us to fall in love with our own reflection.
Israel had continued that long history of neglecting God and going after other pagan gods and for that, as the prophets had continually pointed out, there would be consequences. Exile was one of those consequences, but the greater problem was God’s apparent retreat into hiding. The writer seems to have been conflicted about all this, even implying that God’s hiding may have been the cause of Israel’s sin in the first place. Did God hide from God’s people because they had sinned, or had the people sinned because God had hidden from them?
The writer and his people felt the pain of God’s absence. They had become “unclean” and any “righteous deeds” they had done could not purify them. The “filthy cloth” here refers to a garment stained with menstrual blood, which was considered to be ritually unclean (Leviticus 15:19-24). Sin had caused the nation to dry up like a fallen leaf driven by the wind (Isaiah 64:6). No one prayed anymore or attempted to cling to God because God had “hidden [God’s] face” from them and had given them over to the consequences of their sin (64:7).
To revisit the bus slogan, the people began to feel like there probably was no God. But because of their past experience, this was definitely not good news and they couldn’t simply “stop worrying” and enjoy their lives.
I once saw a quote—maybe it was on a bumper sticker—that went something like this: “If you feel distant from God just ask yourself, ‘Who moved?’” If God seems hidden to us, maybe it’s because we’ve stopped looking for God in the midst of our daily lives. We’ve acted like there’s probably not a God, and our thoughts and actions become a self-fulfilling prophecy. But if we’re paying attention, if we’re looking for God, we don’t have to go far.
In the scriptures, heaven is not a far away place “way beyond the blue” as the old song says, but rather it is God’s realm, God’s dwelling, and it is quite near to us. All we need do is put down the mirror and open a window into the relationship God wants to share with us. Rather than a booming shout from the clouds, God more often is revealed in the “still small voice” we can hear if we’re focused enough to listen. Advent reminds us, too, that if we want to see the face of the hidden God we don’t do so by looking up for a heavenly sound and light spectacular, but rather by looking into the dark recesses of a stable and into the eyes of a humble, helpless child.
Folks like Dawkins tend to lump all religions together, but that’s not unique. Everyday people do it. I’ve heard this saying said to me in some form or another over and over again: “Well, all religions are just different paths toward finding God. They’re all the same, really.” The assumption is that God is really unknowable, too mysterious—that is, if God exists at all.”
My response to that, however, is both intellectual and experiential. It’s intellectual because I understand what Christians have thought for 2,000 years. Christianity is not about people looking for God—it’s about God coming to us in the person of Jesus Christ. Christians make the radical claim that God is, indeed, knowable—that God has a human face. That God has walked among us, taught us, lived with us, suffers with us, even dies for us. Christian theology is all about incarnation—about Immanuel, “God with us.” That doesn’t prove in itself that Christianity is true, but it does prove that it is radically different.
But I also respond experientially. God is not merely an abstract concept that we can neutrally accept or reject. Instead, to believe in God calls for a response and the following of a particular model. That model is Jesus, and if we experience life as Jesus did, live as he did, act as he did, then the world changes. It’s not the absence of faith that will save the world, it is the full embrace of the ethics, life, and worldview of Jesus that will do so. That’s why he taught so much about the Kingdom and called people to “follow me.” Note that it wasn’t “think about me” or “muse about me.” The call to Christian faith is a call to experience by doing.
Blaise Pascal, the great mathematician, combined both the intellectual and experiential when he reasoned his way into belief in God. Pascal, in fact, stated his belief in God in terms of probability and outcome, calling it a “wager.” He reasoned that if one believes and lives as though God exists, and it turns out to be true, one would have gained everything—a life of earthly integrity and heavenly reward. If one believes and lives in God and, in the end, it turns out to be true, they lose nothing—one has still lived a good life and contributed to the world.
On the other hand, if one does not believe in God, yet it turns out that God is real, one could lose everything. Even if one does not believe and it turns out not to be true, at best they have gained nothing.
Pascal’s conclusion: Believe in God and live out that belief and you have everything to gain and nothing to lose!
Rather than convince people like Dawkins that we’re right about God, maybe we should stop arguing and start reflecting God’s presence in positive, world-changing ways. Like the people of Israel, though, our sin and self-interest can get in the way, blocking our vision of God’s true nature and call upon us. God becomes distant and we ignore him, or, worse, we hijack God for our own agendas. I think in that sense Dawkins is right—we don’t often reflect the truth of God.
“We are the clay,” said the writer of Isaiah, and God is the “potter” (64:8). We must not give into the temptation of sin to make gods in our own image. Instead, we submit ourselves to the potter, who can mold us into his own spitting image.
Advent calls us to deep reflection, to not only think about God but to experience God by experiencing and living into a relationship with Jesus Christ. We are not arguing for an unknowable God, but waiting upon the God who comes—who came to the ancient Israelites in pillar and cloud, who came to the people in exile in the form of return and restoration, who came to people in person in Jesus, who comes to us in the midst of our joy and suffering, and who will come again to set the world to rights.
Interestingly, in one of the articles I read about Dawkins there’s a picture of him standing next to a Christmas tree. Apparently, it’s still OK to celebrate a birthday!
Let us celebrate Jesus this season—not by thinking about him, but by following him. He is the God who comes.
Recent Comments